«
»

Fox News Anti-Islam T-Shirt Story Unfairly Attacks ACLU?

Posted on 21. Dec, 2009 by vladowsky in Fox

MANYmore examples of Fox News Bias at www.youtube.com And, more info on the ACLU defending Christians at aclufightsforchristians.com When Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly covered a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union to protect the right to wear a T-Shirt saying “Islam is of the Devil,” the coverage of the story on “The O’Reilly Factor” was so bad, even though it included analysis from two lawyers, Lis Wiehl and Kimberly Guilfoyle, in the so-called “No Spin Zone,” it was really just a …

Related

  • Jail for Praying Story Has Fox News Lies?
    The Fox News story about a principal at a Florida public high school facing jail time for praying at a school event was not only misleadingly reported by Steve Doocy on "Fox and Friends," but, given...
  • Fox News Likes YouTube Censorship?
    On Fox News, Bill O'Reilly and Amanda Carpenter were more than happy to report on the new restrictions on YouTube, though without reporting on the the changes in profanity rules that are proving mos...
  • ACLU Christmas Spirit Beats Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly and Ann Coulter?
    OVER ONE HUNDREDmore examples of Fox News Bias at www.youtube.com And, more info on the ACLU defending Christians at aclufightsforchristians.com Last week, watching Bill O'Reilly and Ann Coulter spe...
  • Fox News Forgets Private Property Rights?
    Despite all the warnings about looming socialism and even communism coming from Fox News these days, the concept of private property rights seemed wholly absent when Fox News' Megyn Kelly reported o...
Bookmark and Share

25 Comments

CaptainVideo890

17. Dec, 2009

“Proselytizing is not okay.” You’ve got to be kidding me. You know what group does that more often than any other?

riseofatheism

18. Dec, 2009

Christians. And no I’m not kidding you. Proselytizing is not okay on government property.

adzug

18. Dec, 2009

christians

CaptainVideo890

18. Dec, 2009

That wasn’t directed at you. I have no reason to trust your opinion anyway, you just hate religion.

CaptainVideo890

18. Dec, 2009

Why would that be? The Constitution prohibits the government from denying anyone the right to free speech.

adzug

18. Dec, 2009

thats not true but watever

riseofatheism

18. Dec, 2009

On government property, proselytizing is illegal. Freedom from religion as well. Remember that.

CaptainVideo890

18. Dec, 2009

I get it, the government gives you the freedom of speech, just not the freedom to change anyone’s mind.

riseofatheism

18. Dec, 2009

You absolutely have the right to proselytize. Just not on government property. I encourage proselytizing. But doing so on government property, r by government paid employees, is and should remain illegal. This protects everyone. So you don’t have to go to school and be preached to by a paganist, a satanist, a Christian, a Muslim, an atheist or what have you. This is for everyones protection, so that there is no conflict, or fighting. Religion causes violence.

riseofatheism

18. Dec, 2009

Being protected from religion means that you maintain your right not to be offended or bothered unnecessarily by people who don’t believe what you do. This is the problem with third world countries. Religion runs the government, and religion silences everyone who doesn’t believe as they do.

CaptainVideo890

18. Dec, 2009

You do know that the road outside your house is public property, right? If the freedom of speech were banned there, which you for some strange reason so desperately desire, your little friends, the NYC Atheists, wouldn’t be able to beg for converts on the city streets.

CaptainVideo890

18. Dec, 2009

You most definitely have a right to not be offended by a religion. Just don’t be offended by it. But don’t go crying to the government.

CaptainVideo890

18. Dec, 2009

Well you aren’t exactly it’s biggest fan.

Verrimgard

19. Dec, 2009

Answer to your first question: Because O’Rielly basically thinks that he IS america, and the rest of us are just sort of here messing up his stuff.

Or close enough anyway.

And for your second question: No. It makes no sense to allow positive statements, but to refuse negative statements. I mean, what the hell? You can express yourself, but only in a positive manner? No. Just, no dude, not cool. Even if that doesn’t snowball, it’s not right.

drone81

19. Dec, 2009

watching religious people slapfight about which religion is better than the other is like watching two three year-olds smack each other with their dicks. it’s incredibly embarassing to behold, but it’s just so ridiculous you can’t really turn away

adzug

19. Dec, 2009

ive studied comparitive relig a long time. im fascinated with the subject. but relig is used by ppl to promote their agendas and bamboozle the poor. but its the story of ppl trying to make sense outta the world too. its a powerful force that needs to be kept in check becuz of power abuses.

CaptainVideo890

19. Dec, 2009

It is clear to me that you have thought through this issue thoroughly, and I thank you for that. However, most religions are just ways for a community to crystallize it’s ideas about good and evil, and when someone tries to use it to increase their own power, the problem is with them, not the religion.

adzug

19. Dec, 2009

thats always the rub aint it? but if the vast majority start going with the philosophy of the leader then that is the relig. now this is the extreme case but nazi germany is a case exp. at times and in some cases relig is the prob.

CaptainVideo890

19. Dec, 2009

It don’t the the Nazis were motivated by religion, though Hitler sort of used his as a rally point early on.

adzug

19. Dec, 2009

no i know it was just exp to illustrate power of 1 person extended to the masses

tishalastre

20. Dec, 2009

NO, I am not European, I am Latin American, and I believe that every single person decerves their place on the world, while they don’t harm others, NO MATTER WHAT RELIGION THEY ARE. So in my world the racists like you, have their spot as well.

Islam is no threat to anyone, REAL islam, It’s completelly ovious that you didn’t care to make a little research, and realize that islam is not what the EXTREMIST AND TERRORIST say in their speches, the islam is a religion for peace.

tishalastre

20. Dec, 2009

You are so full of hatred towards the peole that is not your kind. Most of religions, even the cristian church, “promote” Homophobia, & misogyny, and that is why people are turning off religions. But the real deal is how you live your life and how you live with religion.

Democracy is not nesesarily the best goverment system, It depends on how culturized the people is, if the people is stupid, then democracy is the key to pandemonioum, check venezuela as an example.

Forthelulz01

20. Dec, 2009

I hate bill O’Reily. He’s either purposely lying to the world about stuff like this, or completely ignorant to what organizations like the ACLU actually are.

CireAknow

20. Dec, 2009

Bill O’Reilly’s bitterness towards the good folks at the ACLU stems from their refusal to take his case in regards to sexual explicit phone calls to your producer being free speech.

sidewayznut2009

20. Dec, 2009

Sorry but ACLU was wrong in this case. Positive messages about religion don’t OFFEND ANYONE negative messages do and it doesn’t matter what religion it is. I totally agree with the schools in this case they did the right thing.

I know the point is that they are only smearing the ACLU but they were defending a shitty cause.

Leave a reply